---
product_id: 45903813
title: "Glass Houses: A Novel (Chief Inspector Gamache Novel, 13)"
brand: "louise penny"
price: "€ 42.14"
currency: EUR
in_stock: true
reviews_count: 8
url: https://www.desertcart.fi/products/45903813-glass-houses-a-novel-chief-inspector-gamache-novel-13
store_origin: FI
region: Finland
---

# Glass Houses: A Novel (Chief Inspector Gamache Novel, 13)

**Brand:** louise penny
**Price:** € 42.14
**Availability:** ✅ In Stock

## Quick Answers

- **What is this?** Glass Houses: A Novel (Chief Inspector Gamache Novel, 13) by louise penny
- **How much does it cost?** € 42.14 with free shipping
- **Is it available?** Yes, in stock and ready to ship
- **Where can I buy it?** [www.desertcart.fi](https://www.desertcart.fi/products/45903813-glass-houses-a-novel-chief-inspector-gamache-novel-13)

## Best For

- louise penny enthusiasts

## Why This Product

- Trusted louise penny brand quality
- Free international shipping included
- Worldwide delivery with tracking
- 15-day hassle-free returns

## Description

Glass Houses: A Novel (Chief Inspector Gamache Novel, 13)

## Images

![Glass Houses: A Novel (Chief Inspector Gamache Novel, 13) - Image 1](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51V68fFvy1L.jpg)
![Glass Houses: A Novel (Chief Inspector Gamache Novel, 13) - Image 2](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/415bQorZPzS.jpg)
![Glass Houses: A Novel (Chief Inspector Gamache Novel, 13) - Image 3](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41johMmUbkS.jpg)

## Customer Reviews

### ⭐⭐ 







  
  
    Sorry, but this book is dark and annoying
  

*by K***R on Reviewed in the United States on October 11, 2017*

I have read every Louise Penny and this one was her second most annoying.  The rest are great.  In this book she returns to the swirling miasma of evil theme.  Everything is dark, dark, dark.  But the worst of it is that just as she is about to reveal something, she moves away from that to something else where the people are as clueless as we are.  I am currently at 84% and will finish it, but reluctantly.  In fact, it just happened again that she almost revealed something, skipped to people who are unaware that they are surrounded by impending doom, and then she actually skipped back to another time frame, which was completely confusing.  I'm sure that it is meant to increase suspense but in me it simply increases frustration.

### ⭐ 







  
  
    This is a disaster of a book
  

*by P***T on Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2019*

SPOILER ALERT -- SPOILER ALERTI waited a while to read this book after A Great Reckoning because I knew that it would be impossible to recreate the greatness of that book.  If you haven't read it -- it's a masterpiece.  I was prepared to be disappointed, but I can't begin to express how really dreadful I found Glass Houses.  It is the worst thing Louise Penny has ever written, and in many ways it is a ridiculous book filled with pretensions that it doesn't fulfill.  The best I can say about it is that it is elegantly written with Penny's beautiful prose.This book is supposed to be about conscience and the existence of a higher law that conscience must not violate.  It is a great theme that's wasted in this novel.  Instead the book is filled with gimmicks - the cobrador [the external conscience] being the most obvious, and the author's usual tics are particularly annoying and prevalent in this book - the worst being her build up to a big reveal only to switch to another totally unrelated topic  leaving you hanging.  This is okay now and then, but Penny does it constantly in this book - it's really annoying.In the book Gamache is trying to solve a murder in Three Pines while also trying to bring down a major drug cartel operating in Quebec.  The murder in Three Pines is a smoke screen for the author to hide the bigger issue of the drug cartel, and though they are related, the murder feels like a sub text only.  I think it's really only there as a way to introduce the cobrador.  Gamache has decided that the war on drugs is lost but nonetheless believes that the only way to get any control of it is to bring down this cartel he has discovered.  In pursuit of this he drags his senior officers along with him in this quest.  He poses as an incompetent head of the Surete to lull the cartel into coming in the open. This pose results in many deaths and a rising crime wave in Quebec.  Large drug shipments are ignored and allowed to pass into the United States unhindered causing, by Gamache's own reckoning, hundreds, perhaps thousands of deaths.  To support his inaction he quotes Gandhi and the higher court of conscience, he notes that Churchill probably knew about the bombing of Coventry before it happened but didn't intervene because if he did the Germans might figure out the British had Enigma.  This is ridiculous and unbelievable.  The comparison is meaningless since the war against the Axis could be won whereas the war on drugs will be with us as long as people need to escape reality and pain.  So the ends are not really comparable.  If Gamache [or Penny] believes this comparison they are both out of touch with reality.  Let's suppose Gamache brings down the cartel - in a month, or something like it, the drug trade will be re-established.  The head of the cartel tells him as much at the end of the novel.  So hundreds, perhaps thousands die for nothing because Gamache was obsessed with the war on drugs to the extent that the people who would die because of his obsession didn't really matter - they were the people of Coventry - collateral damage as it were.  Again, this might have been acceptable if his actions could actually stop the flow of drugs, but he can't and no rational person would believe that he could.  This is a huge hole in the novel.  I could not suspend disbelief to accept it.  It made no sense at all.  Finally, Glass Houses creates irreparable damage to the character of Gamache as Penny has so lovingly developed it in previous novels.  Gamache, in this novel, is neither wise, competent nor kind.  He is foolish and dangerous.Don't get me started on the conduct of the trial of the murderer of Katie Evans.  The whole thing is laughable.  The Crown prosecutor, who is in on Gamache's plan with regard to the drug cartel, treats Gamache, his chief witness, like a criminal.  This doesn't make sense.  The two men don't like each other, but should be professional enough not to make everyone in the courtroom aware that something is going on that stinks to high heaven.  It becomes so obvious that the judge finally intervenes and almost blows the whole plan.  To me it is all unnecessary and another one of those gimmicks that don't make sense.  The entire trial is unnecessary to the plot.  It seems to be there specifically so Armand Gamache can commit perjury.  But again this doesn't make sense.  The question that he perjures himself on is irrelevant to the case, or at least the question didn't have to be asked in such a way that Gamache had to lie.  Penny might have set it up so that asking this question was a malicious act on the part of the prosecutor, but that isn't what she did -- the question was set up by Gamache and the prosecutor together.  This is a ploy, and not a very good one, to play to the idea of a higher court and how brave Gamache was to follow his conscience and lie to the court.Finally, in so many of Penny's previous books, the sub plot was Gamache's crusade to clean up the Surete.  In this book he is doing exactly what the men he exposed did -- he is using the law for his own purposes.  He is corrupting his officers by convincing them not to do what they know is their duty.  He is talking about higher causes - which is so often the road to perdition.  He wants them to "Burn their boats".  This sounds courageous and brave but it isn't.  I am reminded of something Thomas More once said.  He said the laws of England were a shield, and he would give the devil himself the benefit of law because if he didn't the laws would mean nothing and one day the devil would turn on him and there would be nothing to protect him.  Gamache should have thought about that instead of Gandhi.  One of the characters in this book says that corruption starts small.  What we see in this book is the small beginnings of corruption.  Gamache says that he doesn't seek power, but he's not afraid to use it - that is a very dangerous and troubling thing for this particular man with his history to say.  Maybe the corruption of Armand Gamache is what Penny's really aiming for.  If it is, I'll re-evaluate my rating on the book, but I hope that's not where she's going.I just don't understand this book, I don't understand what Penny has done to her main character.  I find it all very sad.

### ⭐⭐ 







  
  
    Substance Sacrificed To Style
  

*by O***Y on Reviewed in the United States on November 27, 2018*

As I was reading Glass Houses, I kept thinking how the quality of Penny's novels has sunk and how I needed to write a review to reflect this, despite not generally liking to write book reviews. Then I read her "Author's Note" at the end, about everything that was going on her life as she wrote it, and I felt like a heel. However, I have decided that though she deserves a lot of slack, I think she also deserves an honest evaluation -- as do all potential readers. If it were just this book, I'd let it go, but frankly, her last several books have not been up to the standard of the initial ones in this series. I have read them all, in order, since discovering them slightly more than a year ago, but now I think it is time to give up. This one was more a drudge than a joy.Initially in the series, the characters in Three Pines were well-described, substantial people I wanted to know. They were supportive, loving, kind. They teased each other, understood each other. Often the conversations were amusing, and usually there was at least one instance that caused me to explode unexpectedly into laughter. In fact, I felt that I wanted to move to Three Pines and go to these impromptu dinner parties, and hang out at the bistro, and just be part of this community, this lifestyle. I wanted these people for my friends.Glass Houses had little or none of this flavor. If this is the first book in the series that you read, you will be introduced to a bunch of indistinguishable and bland characters. The only "cute" details about them are holdovers from previous books, and they were starting to feel overused then. Clara has food in her hair. Ruth has a duck. Is Gracie a puppy or a piglet or a rabbit? Gabri has been one of the most colorful and delightful characters in past installments, but if this was your first reading, you probably don't even know which one he was. I loved the stories that mostly took place in Three Pines, with a small mystery and lots of characterization. This one was largely outside of Three Pines, barely included the residents of Three Pines, and was a convoluted mess of a story.Parts of the story were quite original. The cobrador angle was fascinating (partly based in fact, mostly fictional). The back-and-forth-in-time structure, while not original, worked fairly well. We have a trial going on now although we don't know who the defendant is. As the testimony is given, we then go back in time six months to when the murder occurred. There is a separate story outside the courtroom in the "now" that is rather mysterious itself, and lots of time-shifting in the past story, as well. Mostly, it is handled well and not confusing, but a couple of times I had to rely on the weather (miserably humid and hot now vs. miserably cold and sleety at the time of the murder) to figure out when a conversation was taking place. He wipes his sweaty brow ... oh, so this conversation is taking place "now". Etc.The tone of the book was overly dramatic, a style with pretensions of deep significance while actually saying nothing. That got stale fast. Once in the period of a single page, we have these stand-alone paragraphs: "But, of course, he hadn't"; "But, of course, it wasn't"; "But, of course, they weren't". I found myself saying "Stop it, stop it, stop it!" She often -- way way way too often -- reverts to short choppy sentences, or just phrases. or even single words. It is a style that might be effective used sparingly, but is irritating as hell with overuse. Then other times, a tiny bit of conversation is followed with pages of meandering and excruciating detail to explain, support or justify. I became quite impatient for the book to be over.Louise Penny is an excellent story-teller, as evidenced by her past work. She has a creative mind and a subtle sense of humor ... again, as evidenced by her past work. But she needs to take a break and work on her grief, or retire the saga of Three Pines altogether. Her novel-a-year pace, though remarkable, has got to be emotionally and physically draining. And the work has suffered for it.(BTW, if you are planning to read the book despite my review, and if you are at all food-suggestible, I suggest you go out and get a baguette and brie right now. Save you a trip later.)

---

## Why Shop on Desertcart?

- 🛒 **Trusted by 1.3+ Million Shoppers** — Serving international shoppers since 2016
- 🌍 **Shop Globally** — Access 737+ million products across 21 categories
- 💰 **No Hidden Fees** — All customs, duties, and taxes included in the price
- 🔄 **15-Day Free Returns** — Hassle-free returns (30 days for PRO members)
- 🔒 **Secure Payments** — Trusted payment options with buyer protection
- ⭐ **TrustPilot Rated 4.5/5** — Based on 8,000+ happy customer reviews

**Shop now:** [https://www.desertcart.fi/products/45903813-glass-houses-a-novel-chief-inspector-gamache-novel-13](https://www.desertcart.fi/products/45903813-glass-houses-a-novel-chief-inspector-gamache-novel-13)

---

*Product available on Desertcart Finland*
*Store origin: FI*
*Last updated: 2026-02-10*