Writing Metrical Poetry

Just a caveat before I begin. I had been writing metrical verse for some years before purchasing this book. I was familiar with the author because of his years as editor of The Formalist. I happened to come across this book while browsing at Amazon. Intrigued by its title and author, I purchased it, hoping to gain some very detailed insight and advice about the mechanics of writing metrical poetry.Instead, what I received was a defense of the practice of formalism in an age dominated by free verse, a rather basic introduction to scansion and metrical substitution, followed by definitions and examples of blank verse, ballad stanzas, the sonnet and the French forms such as the villanelle and the triolet.Baer's manual offers exercises for the poet, but no way to grade them or evaluate them. The exercises offered are very general, such as "write a sonnet, using either the Italian or English format. Use only pentameters and solid rhymes. Avoid the pop culture. Avoid old-fashioned diction. Avoid convoluted syntax that's manipulated to hit the rhymes."What is the reader to do when she/he has already written 60 or 70 sonnets?The book purposely avoids technical language. You won't learn of anacoluthon, asyndeton, synairesis, aposiopesis, scazons, rima bacciata, apocope, syncope, acatalexis, acephalexis or similar terms.In short, it is a strictly introductory level book, probably intended for the poet who has been dabbling in free verse and who wishes to try her/his hand at formalism, but has very little experience with traditional poetic forms. I have found that many other books go into greater depth, even though these other books are intended to help the reader of metrical poetry and not strictly the writer: Paul Fussell's Poetic Meter and Poetic Form, Beum and Shapiro's The Prosody Handbook: A Guide to Poetic Form, Steele's All the Fun's in How You Say a Thing, Turco's The Book of Forms, Pinsky's The Sounds of Poetry: A Brief Guide, and Hollander's Rhyme's Reason.I think the book would be very useful for its intended readership, but I don't expect a budding neoformalist trying to improve his/her craft to get the type of information she/he is looking for. Had I come across this book in an actual bookstore and had the opportunity to peruse it in more depth, rather than online, I wouldn't have purchased it.

This is an outstanding book that I read while borrowed from the local library. I liked it so much I had to have a paperback copy of my own (so I could mark it up). If you are a poet and would like to improve your writing, this is the book I would recommend to you. It takes you through various forms of metrical poetry and has you do exercises. It really talks to you, that's the tone it's written in. Just like you were sitting there with a casual professor who was trying to help you after class. The exercises challenge you to write like the "real" poets do. Can you write like Robert Frost did? I don't mean the words, I mean the rhythm, the meter. The way the lines are grouped, the way some lines rhyme and the pattern of rhyming. Or not rhyming. We are all so caught up in free verse and no form. This book teaches you the discipline of form, pattern, success. Yes, it even talks a bit about getting ready to publish your work.

I'm very pleased. The book is in great condition.

This is a valuable little book that helps poets disentangle the long standing argument between Modernist poetry and the inherited forms of poetry. The author prefers the structured poetry and gives many examples of how the sound of a poem contributes to its haunting effect. There are essays at the end of the book showing the differing stances still alive in poetry today. He explains poetic terms in an easy way and makes many things formly dark, clear. An excellent book for poets.

The booked arrived quickly and in excellent condition. I am reading through the "course in writing poetry" and have found it quite helpful with the practice suggestions.

Metrical Poetry is not the only form of poetry. There are times when a writer is resticted by using metrical poetry. However, a good book on this subject.

Many poets write only free verse because that's all they know! But learning about only 5 little feet (the iamb, trochee, anapest, dactyl, and spondee) will enable you to enter the centuries-old party of poets who waltz or jive their way into traditional forms. In the book Writing Metrical Poetry, William Baer clearly demonstrates each step, assigns practice pieces, and calls you into the dance.Besides his clear discussions of such important subjects as rhyme, rhythm, compression, lines, emphasis, and metrical feet, Professor Baer provides you with traditional patterns you can turn to whenever you want to write a sonnet, villanelle, triolet, rondeau, or other timeless, well-loved form. Or, if you want to help other poets and poetry students find contemporary uses for classical forms, this highly recommended book will help teachers too.

I'm not a poet, but have always enjoyed reading it. Perhaps there are more technical and advanced books available, but I would say William Baer strikes the right balance explaining the terms and the forms without overwhelming the interested reader or budding poet. Nor does he stop there. He gives examples aplenty and powerfully simple and straightforward analysis. Best of all, he avoids the touchy-feely approach of more populist poetry manuals that throw the rules out the window and just want you to get in touch with your inner self.