Encyclopedia Britannica 2003 Ultimate Reference Suite

I've bought both ENCARTA and BRITANNICA for years. This is my opinion:TEXT: The Britannica is a superb encyclopaedia in text since 1768. If only its electronic version were worthy of it! Text in the electronic version is different from Printed Encyclopaedia (large articles have been shortened). Britannica claims that it has more articles than Encarta, but this is a joke: articles like "Spain" are only one with a lot of subdivisions in Encarta, while in Britannica subdivisions are considered articles, and you must "jump" from one subdivision to other.In some areas Encarta is better than Britannica. For example consider "controversial events in modern history" such us "My Lai Massacre": In Encarta one large article and a lot of mentions in others; Britannica does not even know the name.In theory, you can update Britannica over the Internet free for a year quarterly (4 times), but this does not work. Encarta is updated free EVERY WEEK) with new articles and additions to the old ones. The new articles and additions are included in the next version of Encarta, but this is not true for Britannica. For instance: "Bilbao, Spain": Britannica does not mention the Guggenheim Museum, which opened in 1997, and the population is !!estimated!! of 1982. The same article in Encarta: similar text, 3 photos, 1 map, related articles, sidebar, dynamic timelines and 4 internet pages, plus one specific article "Bilbao Guggenheim Museum". I think Britannica updates its contents very slow, whereas Encarta is completely alive.MULTIMEDIA: They say that "serious" or "adult" readers do not care about "pictures"; that multimedia is only for kids. I do not agree, because I think that, sometimes, "A picture is worth a thousand words". Works of art, anatomy, maps, diagrams ... Encarta devastates Britannica with a lot of photos, paintings, drawings, maps, animations, interactivities, videos, music and sounds, pictures, literature sidebars, new translation dictionaries (not very good though), atlas, 2-D and 3-D virtual tours, timeline, games ... It's not only the quantity and quality. It is the easy access you have to all the multimedia, and that text and multimedia are fully integrated. Britannica's Atlas is a joke and statistics do not exist or I have not found them. Encarta's has a great detail: 1 cm/ 4 km all over the world (though you find some mistakes) and hundreds of statistical maps.INTERFACE AND SOFTWARE: This is the worst side of Britannica. In Encarta you only have to type a phrase, a word or the beginning of a word to see all the articles and multimedia that contain it. If you have typed the name of a small village, you see it in the Atlas without clicking again. If Encarta does not find anything, it gives you alternative spellings and you find what you were looking for. To go "jumping" from article to article is very easy and quick, because you have a lot of links and the "Related Articles" section. If you need to copy text or pictures, the integration with Microsoft WORD is perfect. If you don't understand a word, you can double-click it and the dictionary appears in a window.Navigating with Britannica is different. You get crazy. I will only give an example: if you do not know the exact and correct spelling of a name or word, it does not help you with alternative or similar spellings. The dictionary does not permit double-clicking of words in the text of articles for their definitions. Once an article is displayed you cannot search for a word within the article. This is extremely annoying: you have to perform this task yourself. One "pro" for Britannica: they say it works with Macintosh computers.This is my piece of advice: If you can afford it, buy both. If not... read again this review.

The user interface is very marginal. In that I agree with the other reviewers.If I set the text display size to medium or large and exit, the settings are not preserved - when you restart the program you get the minimum text size. Naturally, the search/browse pane on the left does not reflect whatever text display size you specify, period. You always get small text. In my opinion there is something wrong with the fonts, the display just does not seem as clear as it could be? At the end of installation, the Windows FONT folder was opened for some unknown reason. I just closed it. Maybe I was supposed to chose whatever font I want? I have looked and looked and I can't find anyway to change the display font now.When you select an entry to display, the entry is never, ever displayed in a full window, you always get a 3 1/2 x 4 miniwindow. Grrr. You can, at least, manually maximize it. However, if you close it and then select another entry to display, again you get the miniwindow. If you maximize this miniwidnow and select another entry to display, it comes up as a miniwindow again (then again sometimes it gets overwritten with a maximized window, I can't figure why or when this happens). It just seems like you can't get a full size window and keep it that way.Sorry if this seems confusing but the program is confusing. Microsoft Encarta has a much more 'rational' interface.I have all three of the digital encyclopedias available on Amazon.com. This is how I would rate them. If you have the money, buy both 1) & 2). The World Book 2003 Ultra-Deluxe (they must have a sense of humor?)is a total pain in the so and so. Everytime you load it you have to insert the installation CD and I can't figure out how (if?) you can get around that. I submitted a review of it that is so negative I doubt if it will be accepted.1) Microsoft Encarta2) Encyclopaedia Britannica 20033) World Book 2003 Ultra-DeluxeWhat is the conclusion of this somewhat rambling 'review'? I decided to fork out the [money] and buy the Encyclopaedia Britannica 2003 Print (Hardcover) Edition. I will use the digital version to look up words or topics and then use the print version to actually read the entry.

I have been a print user since high school (25 years) and a CD/DVD user since the 1997 version. What is it with this company? Every year they change the interface, but each edition is hopeless in many new ways! Can't they ever get this right? It's almost like the software is incredibly dumbed down so that literate people will prefer the print version. And they are utterly unresponsive when you complain.Nevertheless, you have to buy a copy every couple of years because, well, there is only one Britannica! No Encarta is ever going to have the scholarly content I'm looking for. But I'm sticking with DVD 2002 for now, even though it has other flaws (dvd can't install to hard drive, etc). No need to "upgrade" to another set of mistakes this year.