CRKTPilar II Large EDC Folding Pocket Knife: Everyday Carry, Black Blade, Flipper Open, Frame Lock, G10 Handle, Reversible Pocket Clip 5315G

This is a great knife, very sharp, and deploys easily and quickly. I'm used to Kershaw knives with the spring assisted flipper, but this one comes out very nicely even without a spring. I have other CRKT knives and they all have been good quality at a fair price. Lockup is very secure, no side-to-side wiggle, and the blade is centered perfectly.

I had one of the original Pilars and loved it as a work knife. It was small enough to not be imposing in the work place, but was extremely ergonomic and could take a beating. Unfortunately, I lost it at work and have not been able to find it.All of this being said, I was excited to try the same knife with an assist, but didn’t know if the size would change my love of the knife. Honestly, it isn’t much larger than the original Pilar, and I think putting the grippy black handle on half of the knife (at least on mine, not sure if this is how they are supposed to come) it feels even better in the hand.The knife came EXTREMELY sharp out of the box. You can’t beat this as a work knife. It looks unimposing, isn’t going to cost you half a paycheck to replace if lost and it can take a beating. I hope that they continue making these for years to come.

I wanted a smaller knife to pocket carry but need a sturdy one as well. This knife fits my hand well, is light weight, and super sharp. I really love the blade profile and it locks solidly. I very pleased with it.

Extremely sharp light weight every day carry knife. Would definitely purchase another as a backup.

I use it around the garden for quick harvests or a spot prune on a plant. Solid construction and one hand open and close once you get a feel for it.

The Pilar has a great weight and feel in hand. The action on the ball bearing system used to open the Pilar is incredible. I like the knife a lot but there are some flaws so I found a competitor (Kershaw Static) with a nearly identical design to help in my decision process.TLDR: Honestly, the amount of similarities between these two knives is astounding. If price is your biggest factor buy whichever is on sale. If "cool factor" is more important go with the CRKT. If practical application is more important go with the Kershaw. but either way, you'll have a great budget friendly knife.IF YOU WANT MORE SPECIFICS KEEP READING.I need to start by explaining the Pilar II large is a significantly better upgrade from the Pilar II small. I had the small (and also reviewed it) and was not a fan - this large one however, is a much better tool.Starting with both knives closed the CRKT has a tip down or tip up pocket clip option. Kershaw only offers tip up pocket clip. That being said Kershaw utilizes a deep carry clip while CRKT has just a traditional style clip. I prefer the Kershaw style of clip but the tip down carry of CRKT. I call the pocket clips a draw.Both knives offer a flip to open option but the CRKT also has a thumb hole (spider hole) if you prefer that method. This could be seen as a con when cutting something soft (like cheese) as it could lead to debris in the hole but ultimately more opening options gives CRKT the edge.Both knives open very smoothly however the Kershaw is able to reach locked position with more ease than the CRKT. The CRKT offers a nicer sounding and feeling click when reaching locked position but I give this win to Kershaw as I prefer function over vanity. I think the Kershaw is simply better designed in this regard even if the CRKT has that nice feel.Another win for the Kershaw comes when comparing the overall ease-of-use design itself. The edges around the flipper and thumb hole on the CRKT are sharp and almost painful when applying pressure. Its like they forgot to finish that part of the blade. The Kershaw has nice rounded edges that still alow for nice handling. Both knives have jimping on the flipper so no reason for CRKT to have design (flaw?) on purpose.Once open both utilize a blade finger choil to provide more support. Both have a flaw design here as the choil directly comes to a point on the blade. I would prefer a slight rounded edge on the choil to avoid accidental finger slicing when gripping the blade. Kershaw does this on other knives so not sure why they didn't on this one. That said Kershaw does have a wider choil and thus makes it less likely to accidentally have a regrettable finger placement.The CRKT handle really outshines the Kershaw. Its got a thicker base that provides more confidence in use. The Kershaw handle is just too slim. And it feels a little cheaper simply bc G10 is used all around instead of only one side like the CRKT.Blade length: Kershaw is longer but both stay under 3 inches. I give this one to Kershaw simply bc the slightly longer blade length is going to be more practical. I will say tho, the blade tip on the CRKT is just cooler lookingBoth use similar (albeit not exactly the same) locking mechanisms. And while the Kershaw does have the liner lock slightly protruding from the frame allowing for easy use, the CRKT is just easier. There is more grip available for your thumb and you never question yourself when using the lock one handed without looking.

Bought this for my son who used a Leatherman product. He prefers this knife. Heavy duty, sharp, gets the job done. Good price.

Not bad for the price

Es una de las navajas más bonitas que tengo tanto en funcionalidad como en diseño