Funeral Games Paperback – June 11, 2002

The third and final book of Mary Renault’s Alexander the Great trilogy, “Funeral Games” begins with the death of Alexander. However, at the time of his death the only direct heirs were two unborn sons and a mentally-impaired half-brother, creating an immediate and fierce struggle to claim the power and throne.Like the previous two in the series, this book is dense with names, locations, and shifting political alliances. However, it is well worth the read! The book is magnificently written, and truly captures the chaotic time, as well as the endurance of Alexander the Great’s legacy.

Pros: Interesting concept, a few well drawn characters, well written, suspenseful.Cons: The character jumping is not Renault's best technique, doesn't work together as a whole.This book is perhaps one of Renualt's more intriguing. At least it has a great many political conflicts and machinations and plots, all following Alexander's death. The omniscient third person point of view is certainly more suited to this type of book with all its twists and turns than it is to a book like "Fire from Heaven", but it still gives the story an oddly disjointed feeling. Renault excels when she focuses more closely on one character, though there are certainly some interesting figures in this book. It is nice to see more of the story from women's viewpoints as opposed to the last two books which were almost entirely about men. Eurydike, at least, is well drawn.The book is well written as always. Amazingly, it doesn't seem to suffer despite the fact that the main character (Alexander) is dead. The book's ending seems appropriate, but also makes one wish that Renault would have developed the characters that had a personal connection with Alexander more fully rather than concentrating more on the characters of political importance. Renault is somewhat unable to tie up all her loose ends."Funeral Games" is a well written and in some places intriguing book, but it lacks a certain cohesiveness. 4- stars.

Another story about the Greeks and Macedonians and funeral rituals BCE. Memorable.

Mary Renault wrote numerous historical novels set in the ancient Greek world. She meticulously researched her subjects, and her novels are credited for being historically accurate. The interactions of her characters are highly plausible, with dialogue that rings authentic. Her first novel was The Last of the Wine, written in 1956, and set during the Peloponnesian Wars. Her trilogy was written over a period that spanned the `70's. I've read and reviewed the first two volumes, Fire from Heaven, written in 1969, and The Persian Boy, written in 1972. This would be her concluding volume, written in 1982. She died the next year.Renault was a homosexual. It is difficult to imagine the full circumstances for her decision, but in 1948 she and her "significant other" fled what they considered to be an intolerant England for a more liberal South Africa, where she would live for the rest of her life. Though she always stated that she did not want to be categorized as a "homosexual writer," she did legitimately depict the various known and suspected homosexual relationships in the Greek world, including Alexander's. Such inclinations had very real world consequences for the survival of his empire. As Renault recreates the words of Ptolemy: ` "A pity his mother was not like her. She would have had him married before he set out from Macedon, and seen that he got a son. He could have had an heir of fourteen by this time. She'd not have sickened him with a marriage while he was a child. Whose fault was it that he wasn't ready for a woman till he met the Bactrian?" Thus, unofficially, did most Macedonians refer to Roxane.'Though homosexual rights are now the daily grist for Supreme Court decisions, when she was writing, it is important to recall that it was not until 1964 that the same Court declared Tropic of Cancer not obscene, and homosexuality inhabited an even further outer fringe from "acceptable society." But the sexuality, as Renault herself would state, was only incidental to her works. And this final volume primarily involved the power struggle upon Alexander's death in 323 B.C. among Perdikkas, who was Alexander's second-in-command, Antipatros, his trusted Regent, and Olympias, his mother. As one might suspect, it was "ugly," with Renault graphically depicting same. It eventually led to four relatively stable power blocks 40 years later. Renault's work focuses on the first 13 of these years, with an epilogue of sorts, in 286 B.C. set in King Ptolemy's book room in Alexandria, in present-day Egypt.Of the three volumes, I felt the middle one, The Persian Boy to be the strongest. In the final volume, she may have realized that her powers were waning. Still, all three volumes are an important legacy that help the modern reader understand the ancient world. 5-stars.

I have just read the trilogy of which this is the final installment. From the first words of "Fire From Heaven" through "The Persian Boy" and ending with the last words of "Funeral Games" this remarkable series of novels leaves me wishing Alexander had lived longer so these books could have also. Renault's in depth research and her skill with words made me feel that I was on campaign with Alexander. If I had to pick a personal favorite among the three books it would have to be "The Persian Boy" and, though a difficult task, my favorite character its title player Bagoas. Highly recommended to lovers of historical novels.

the problem with Funeral Games is that it is essentially static.everybody dies without much suspense. Of course, Roxane would try to murder everybody else. and of course poor Arridaios would be murdered as would be his intended bride. AGRGH

For you history buff, this is a well written and interesting historic novel. I recommend you read the first two in the series first though. This book can stand alone but the others are so good, it would be a pity not to read them in order.

This is the book where Ms Renault had many sources to access and by now had developed an intimacy with time, place and characters.This book deals with the vacuum Alexander left behind. It was a bloody, vicious and precarious time but by denying herself and us a framework of modern judgement or sentimentality, Ms Renault encouraged us all to look upon everything she presented (violence, love, homosexuality, ambition) without prejudice. To see it as all being one.Ms Renault wrote only as a human being, neither as a man nor woman, and I admire her all the more for it.