Guns

I watched this movie because I like guns and appreciated the opportunity to admire the beauty of the late Phyllis Davis. It is a dramedy, combining the swagger of Erik Estrada with an hilarious lack of gun knowledge. The star is a huge nickel finish Dan Wesson .357 Maximum (not Magnum).

This was a blind but for me simply because I’m a big Andy Sidaris fan. If you’ve seen “any” of his films, you know what you’re getting into and “Guns” was no different. While not one of his best, we enjoyed it well enough to keep it in the collection. As a Sidaris film, it feels like it should have been better. Sometimes he tries too hard to make them unnecessarily complicated. But there is a rad ninja sequence in a gym, and he still directs the worst love scenes I’ve ever seen on film.....ever. They’re hilarious! While not as good as Hard Hunted, Seven, Malibu Express, or his Bad Movie Night masterpiece Hard Ticket to Hawaii, it’s an enjoyable mess, if a bit dull at times.

A fun, yet quirky, ride of murder and exposure that follows a cohesive plot to keep the audience interested.

95:36 minRated R1080p24 (1,78:1)DTS-HD MA 2.0 stereoNote: The fifth movie in the Andy Sidaris series is also the first with surround* sound on the BD, as it is mastered in DTS-HD MA 2.0 stereo (*=requires Dolby Pro Logic or DTS Neo) !The review of a Dr.Larson on blu-ray.com with supposedly dual mono is wrong !!!

Amazing flick with lots of naked girls with guns action flick. I really enjoyed this movie.

I don't know why this movie gets over 4 stars unless it is because there are so many big-boobed naked women. I suspect that is the case rather than a movie with a plausible storyline. When Donna shows up well after the killers left the dining room and then later says that the woman was killed by a .22 caliber silenced pistol, no way. Seeing two men walk out of the women's restroom and assuming they were the killers, I might go with that, but later saying they were transvestites? No, and the "Chinese" weapon with the red star, like the Chinese put a red star on everything. Airplanes flying further than they are capable of. And the thing is, why would anyone think that killing a federal agent and leaving their personal calling card WON'T bring the agents partners to Las Vegas (and how they deduced a Colombian drug Lord would be in Vegas who knows?). Estrada's character complaining about being stressed because the agents where there in Las Vegas, silly nonsense, they would have been there anyways. Generally, the movie seems to just be a random assortment of plot ideas strung between scenes where the female characters get a chance to show off their boobs which I think is more about targeting the male demographic than a good movie.

“Digital” copy is worthless! Not sure why they bothered. The movie? Well... you have to already know what you’re getting with an Andy Sidaris film.

Were the 1990's THAT bad?Bad acting.Bad plot.Bad soft-porn.Bad production qualities (i.e. sound, scene location, sets, costumes, script supervision, etc.).Oh, yeah, and really, really bad hair (though, I guess that reflects the 1990's a bit).Every, single, scene, was just bad.This reminds of a pix some rich guy underwrites, to keep a promise to make his mistress a "movie star". There was no redeeming qualities at all. There's no way this rated 4+ stars, without someone buying reviews.