Foundations of Wesleyan-Arminian Theology

This is a good, short overview on the topic of Arminianism. If you're looking to understand the basics of how Arminians differ from Calvinists and why, this is a good first step. It develops its points out of the history of Protestant theology, which I found helpful. One caveat: this book does assume that you're coming from a solidly Wesleyan ("holiness") background, and the language reflects that. If you're coming from a different tradition, there may be points where you feel a bit lost. However, if you're reading a book called "Foundations of Wesleyan-Arminian Theology," chances are you have the academic chops to do a bit of research or contextual reading and figure it out.

There was nothing about the product that I disliked. The book is in good condition. I am using it in my research for a project I'm working on.

Definitely recommend this book

Those who don't like Mildred Wynkoop's "Foundations of Wesleyan-Arminian Theology" (1967 and 1972 paperback) would do well to reconsider her brief but poignant work. This small book (only 128 pages total, two of which are an extended bibliography) firmly defines the differences between contemporary Arminianism and Calvinism. It is a one of a kind teacher for the Free Will-Predestination debate.Beginning from a theological base Wynkoop accurately presents these late 16th century doctrinal movements. She explains that neither side understood the other to be biblically based. Considering the prominent followers of the initial Jacob Arminius and John Calvin (Eipscopus and Beza) she says that those students changed the original perspectives of their teachers. Debate, often turning murderous in the late Reformation period, began which continues into the current day.With brilliant clarity the author describes the Synod of Dort's adoption of the Calvinists' "Answer" to Armininism and its heretical declaration for the Remonstrants (Arminius' followers). This book suggests that today's Prevenient Grace-Irresistible Grace debate took root from that 1619 decision. By the end Wynkoop traces the debate's influence on John Wesley and many modern Wesleyans (Wesleyans tend to follow Wesley's Arminian lead).This enterprising book is a must read for all who have ever considered the Arminian-Calvinist controversy. If you are a member of the debate you will be informed with Wynkoop's Wesleyan perspective. If you are new to the quarrel she will teach you. This book is a quick read and will prove to be a valueable quick reference for all Free Will-Unconditional Election debate students. It is very recommendable.

An abundance of views, but clarity in the closing conclusions. Even John Calvin, was not seemingly a true "Calvinist", by present day terms.

Within the span of about 120 or so pages, Dr. Wynkoop concisely covers the history, development, and contemporary position of what has at times been the most divisive issue among protestants. She pulls no punches when she offers her critique of Calvinism and her view of what is at stake in the debate, and yet she does so with grace--always reminding the reader of the contributions of Calvin and Calvinists and warning against further division in the Church.I bought this book wanting to know more about classical Wesleyan-Arminianism theology, knowing I leaned in that direction but only having known the debate from the Calvinist side. Reading this book made me realize how much the debate today revolves around Calvinism, in that the debate seems to always be for/against Calvinism; this is significant because even if Arminianism is the assumed alternative, few rarely understand or appreciate why this debate is important--seeing it only from the a Calvinist's insistence on a proper understanding of God and grace. For Dr. Wynkoop,Orthopraxy--how Christians live out their faith--is what is at stake. This book convinced me and I highly recommended it to all--Calvinists, Arminians, and those in-between!

This book is a very good summary of the Christian beliefs as found in the religious tradition known as Wesleyan-Arminian, which would include many church denominations such as the Methodists of several branches, and also Church of the Nazarene, Wesleyan Church, Salvation Army, and others that have their roots from John Wesley. I highly recommend this for study by anyone who wants to understand this system of theological belief.

I absolutely loved this book. The vocabulary might be beyond the reach of most of my students, but Wynkoop's logical, clear, step-by-step approach is the best discussion of the differences between Wesleyan-Arminian and Reformed Theology that I have seen so far.

A very helpful work by Wynkoop, who references early church voices, such as Pelagius and Augustine as well as later influences such Calvin and Armenius. She offers us a summary of the theological position of historical Wesleyans and tracks how changes have come into play, whilst emphasising the positions taken by those who today define themselves as Wesleyans.Inevitably there is a Calvinist/Arminian debate which she hosts from a Wesleyan standpoint and makes an excellent stand for truth. A very worthwhile addition to my library.

A clear summery of the tension between two "views" within the church. It will help to understand the different building blocks and foundation of each.